afkaOne AI Brain across support, sales, recruiting and the store, every action gated and on the record
Customers

Your recruiter's deep agent.

A deep agent for hiring that fixes what AI broke: it separates real candidates from the AI-written flood, verifies each one is a real, consistent human, and gives every score a reason, while a human signs every reject and every offer, by design.

Live in minutes. Connect your ATS and inbox, then brief it like a colleague, by phone or in Slack.

What is the afka Recruiting agent? A single AI Brain for an SMB hiring team, run as three coordinated agents (sourcing, screening, and onboarding & engagement) on one shared talent graph. It turns a one-line brief into a ranked, reasoned shortlist: de-noising the AI-written application flood, flagging fakes and identity drift as signals for human review (never an auto-reject), interviewing on the candidate's terms (text, voice or video, no timer), carrying new hires through onboarding and early engagement, and keeping one governed candidate record with the why. It is built for the 2026 reality that AI broke the pipeline, and for compliance: reject, screen-out and offer are never finalized by the AI at any autonomy level.

Works inside the hiring stack you already run: Greenhouse, Lever, Ashby, Workable, LinkedIn and thousands more
GreenhouseLeverAshbyWorkableRecruiteeLinkedInGmailGoogle CalendarMicrosoft 365Slack GreenhouseLeverAshbyWorkableRecruiteeLinkedInGmailGoogle CalendarMicrosoft 365Slack
Product

Built for the reality that AI broke hiring.

Everyone sells "source and screen faster." But speed is commoditized. The real 2026 pain is a flood of AI-written applications, fake candidates, and a funnel real people bail on. afka fixes that, and keeps a human on every decision that matters.

3

Coordinated agents, one graph
Sourcing, screening, and onboarding & engagement work as one deep agent on a shared talent graph, so retention outcomes recalibrate how the next role is sourced and screened.
0

Rejects the AI finalizes
Reject, screen-out and offer are never finalized by the agent, at any autonomy level. A human signs every candidate-impacting decision. Compliance is the design, not a setting.
24/7

De-noising the flood
It works overnight to flag AI-written and duplicate applications with the evidence, so you wake up to the few candidates actually worth your minute, not 41 look-alikes.
See what it does

Four jobs, three coordinated agents.

Everything below runs in your own ATS and inbox, as sourcing, screening, and onboarding & engagement on one talent graph. Candidate-impacting actions are gated by design, and every score is written with its reasoning to an append-only audit log.

Separates real candidates from the AI flood.

Flags AI-written and templated applications, spots duplicates and the same human applying twice, and surfaces the genuinely placeable few, with the evidence and a reason, never a bare score. In 2026 a real candidate is the scarce resource, and it finds them.

Verifies a real human, flags never verdicts.

Checks identity continuity across channels and integrity signals on video evidence to catch deepfakes and real-time assistance. Every flag routes to you for review, and it never auto-rejects anyone on a suspicion.

Interviews on the candidate's terms.

Async evidence interviews where the candidate picks text, voice or video, with no timer, testing real reasoning over gameable scripts. It is transparent that it is an assistant and a human decides, which reverses the roughly 40% who bail on AI-only rounds.

Onboards, keeps them engaged, and never ghosts.

Ranks with written reasoning, keeps every candidate updated so no one is ghosted, carries new hires through onboarding and early engagement, and learns from who actually gets hired and stays on the shared talent graph, recalibrating on retention, not vanity speed.

Product

It de-noises the flood, shows its reasoning, and never rejects a soul on its own.

The same four questions get answered on every action and written to the audit log: who started it, which agent ran it, what data it touched, and why it was allowed.

01

De-noises overnight

Scores all 41 against your profile, flags 26 as AI-templated with the giveaway evidence, and catches 2 duplicate identities. Nothing rejected.

02

Shows the why, with quotes

The 4 worth your minute come with written reasoning and quotes from the actual resume, not a black-box number you have to trust.

03

Flags integrity for review

One video interview trips a liveness check. It routes to you with the evidence: a signal, never a verdict, and never an auto-reject.

Human review
04

You decide, it records

You advance, pass, or interview. Every step, and the reason, lands in one candidate record and the append-only audit log.

Customers

You wake up to the four that matter, not the forty-one.

It triages the overnight flood while you sleep, then sends one message at 07:30, with the reasoning for every candidate it surfaces.

Aafka · Recruiting
07:30 · morning digest
Backend role: 41 new applications overnight. 26 flagged as AI-templated (evidence attached), 2 duplicate identities caught. 4 worth your minute: here is why for each, with quotes from their resumes. Heads up: 2 candidates have been waiting on your interview feedback for 3 days.
And every Friday, a verifiable review: candidates you advanced vs surfaced, outreach acceptance and evidence-interview completion, offers accepted, and the adverse-impact self-check for every role, plus what the hire would have cost in agency fees. Real outcomes, and every reject on record was signed by a human.
Standard

Hiring is high-risk AI, so a human signs every decision.

Hiring is regulated as high-risk under the EU AI Act, NYC Local Law 144 and EEOC scrutiny. afka is built so the AI never makes the call that affects a person's livelihood. Every afka agent is built to the same operating standard.

A human signs every reject

Reject, screen-out and offer are never finalized by the agent, at any autonomy level. It prepares the decision with the evidence, and a person signs it. This gate does not have an "off."

Integrity flags are signals

Fake, deepfake and identity-drift signals route to human review with the evidence, never an automatic rejection. A suspicion never ends someone's candidacy on its own.

Fairness is checked

An adverse-impact self-check runs on every shortlist, and a breach pauses the role's scoring for your review. It never scores on protected attributes, and stores only candidate-provided evidence.

SuggestSources, ranks and drafts everything with its reasoning, and waits. Nothing reaches a candidate until you release it.
ReviewSources, screens and schedules on its own, but holds every outreach send for approval, and reject, offer and any integrity-flagged decision always go to a human.
AutoHandles sourcing, ranking, scheduling and ATS write-back within your rules. Rejections, offers and adverse actions never run autonomously, that gate has no tier.

It knows when it is time to hire, before you do.

Because your afka agents share one memory, the signal to open a role reaches recruiting from the teams already feeling the strain.

A support queue overflowing

A sustained support surge becomes a staffing signal ("open a CX role?") with the workload evidence attached, before burnout hits.

Sales outgrowing the team

A jump in won deals flags the need to hire for delivery capacity, before the work outruns the people who do it.

A silver-medalist worth re-surfacing

When a role like a past one opens, the strong-but-declined candidates from last time come back up automatically, no re-sourcing from scratch.

One record the team trusts

Every touch and its reasoning live in one candidate record, so a handoff to the hiring manager is context, not archaeology.

What it won't do.

Being specific about the edges is part of the standard. Here is where the agent deliberately stops.

It won't reject anyone on its own

Reject, screen-out and offer are never finalized by the AI at any autonomy level. A human signs every decision that affects a candidate. There is no setting that changes this.

It won't convict on a flag

Fraud, deepfake and identity signals are routed to you for review with the evidence, never used to auto-reject. A suspicion is a prompt to look, not a verdict.

It won't score on who you are

It never scores on protected attributes or their proxies, runs an adverse-impact check on every shortlist, and stores only the evidence a candidate provided, not a background-data profile.

It won't ghost a candidate

Every active candidate gets a transparent status update on the clock. No one is left waiting in silence, and the agent always says it is an assistant when asked.

FAQ

Questions hiring teams ask.

Isn't AI in hiring a legal risk?
That is exactly why afka is built the way it is. Hiring is high-risk AI under the EU AI Act, NYC Local Law 144 and EEOC scrutiny, so the agent never finalizes a reject, screen-out or offer at any autonomy level; a human signs every candidate-impacting decision. It runs an adverse-impact check on every shortlist, never scores on protected attributes, and stores only candidate-provided evidence, not a background-data profile.
How does it handle the flood of AI-written applications?
It de-noises the inbound overnight: flagging AI-templated and duplicate applications with the evidence, catching the same human applying under different identities, and surfacing the genuinely strong few with written reasoning and quotes from the actual resume. You wake up to the candidates worth your minute, not 41 look-alikes, and nothing is rejected without you.
Will candidates trust an AI interview?
More than an AI-only one, and that is the point. The agent is transparent that it is an assistant and that a human decides, lets the candidate pick text, voice or video with no timer, and never ghosts anyone. That design reverses the roughly 40% of candidates who bail on AI-only rounds, so your funnel gets bigger, not smaller.

Hire a recruiter that fixes what AI broke.

Connect your ATS and inbox, brief it like a colleague, and wake up to the few real candidates worth your minute: de-noised, reasoned, and with every decision that matters signed by a human.