afka uses analytics cookies to understand how visitors use the site. No ads, no data sales.

Privacy
afkaOne AI Brain across support, sales, recruiting and the store, every action gated and on the record
afka vs Glean

Glean finds the answer. afka finishes the work.

Glean is enterprise search: it builds an index of company documents and permissions, and it answers questions from that index. afka is agentic execution under governance. The two products solve different problems, and this page states the difference plainly.

What Glean does well

Glean builds an index of company content and its permissions, and answers questions from it. When the index is ready, the search is genuinely good, and a large company with a decade of documents has a real need for it.

What afka does instead

afka does not exist to find a document. afka executes work inside the tools the company already uses, and the value begins before any connector is attached: a new workspace picks a business function and receives a first finished artifact in under a minute, from seeded sample data.

Answers against outcomes

Glean returns an answer. afka returns a resolved ticket, a sent quote, a screened shortlist, a restocked catalog, a published post.

Time to value

An index has to be complete before the first answer is possible, and the vendor documentation describes deployment in weeks. The first job from afka does not depend on an index, so it does not wait for one.

Governance on every action

Every afka action carries an autonomy level, sensitive actions wait for approval, and every action lands in an append-only audit log. A search product does not need this machinery. An execution product is not safe without it.

When Glean is the better choice

A company that primarily needs to find things should buy an index. A company that primarily needs work done should buy execution.

Buy execution, not retrieval.

Start free, pick a business function, and judge afka on a finished artifact.

Start free