afka uses analytics cookies to see how visitors use the site, and a service that can identify the company a visitor works for. We do not sell your data. Decline and none of it loads.
It works in the accounts you gave it, and the finished thing lands in the channel where you asked.

@afka we're tracking supplier orders in a spreadsheet and it's falling apart. Can you build us something proper?
Built and live: orders.afka.page. The team signs in with their work email, and I flag anything running late in #ops.
afka is hired by the company, not rented by the seat. Your ops lead and your marketer brief the same hire, and it keeps what it learns.
Week three is better than week one: you stop re-explaining the business, and the context stops living in one person’s head.
Start free
@afka what did we decide on the Q3 supplier switch?
You picked Nordica in the June 12 thread. Marcus’s open concern was shipping cost, and the revised quote came in under the old one. Summary attached.
You connect the tools your team already pays for, and afka works in them the way a new hire would once you granted access. Nothing is pasted into a chat, and a connection you remove is gone the moment you remove it.
Thousands more connect the same way. If something you use is missing, it can usually build the connection itself.
Say it once, in a sentence, and it becomes a standing job with a time on it. It arrives finished, and it stops when you say stop.
Last week across every ad account, with the waste flagged and a suggestion for where that budget should go.
Every open deal pulled from the CRM: what moved since last week, and which two deserve a call before the week closes.
It sits in the Zoom, Meet or Teams call, takes on what was agreed, and does it afterwards. The notes are the smallest part.
Not a prompt library and not a settings page. Train afka the way you would train a new hire: walk it through the job one time.
Walk through the work the way you would with a person in their first week, in the channel, in your own words. The messy real version is exactly what it needs.
What it understood comes back as a written procedure you can open and correct. The training is a document, not a black box.
If the job should repeat, it proposes a standing task and leaves it paused. Nothing runs until someone reads it and approves. That pause is deliberate.
The channel is where you ask for the work. It is rarely where the work should live.
A review, a dashboard, a client report: a real page at a link, refreshed on its own schedule, next to the document version for the people who want one.
The ticket answered, the record updated, the refund issued, the campaign paused. The work, done in your own tools, with the receipt in the channel.
Emailing your customer list or touching what people pay: work like that waits in the thread until someone presses approve. You set how far it may go on its own, per task.
It also pushes back. A thin brief gets questions, and a number that looks wrong gets flagged instead of pasted into the report.
Hit pause and it stops, provably, mid-run — and every action it took is in a log you can read.

@afka send the price increase email to the full customer list.
Draft is ready. Before I send: 340 of these accounts renewed in the last 30 days, and the draft still quotes the old support hours. I would fix the wording and hold the recent renewals.
afka runs on frontier models, and when a better one ships it picks that one up. The setting decides how deeply it thinks about a task, and that decides what the task costs. Every run shows what it used.
A lookup, a reply, a record updated. Cheap, and most of the day is made of these.
Base rateA review, an audit, a triage across a queue. Several steps, several tools, one finished result.
The everyday settingA build, a migration, a piece of research that takes real reasoning. Rare, and always shown before it runs.
Shown before it runsPricing is per workspace, not per seat. The tenth teammate costs the same as the first.
See pricingAn assistant hands you the next step and you do it. afka does the step: it opens the ticket, updates the record, issues the refund, writes the page. The difference is not how it answers, it is whether the work exists afterwards.
In Slack and in Microsoft Teams, in the channels you invite it to, and in your Zoom, Google Meet and Microsoft Teams calls, where it takes on what was agreed and does it afterwards.
Yes, and the memory is shared across the workspace. Tell it once that invoices go out on the 1st and it acts on that from then on. If you want a clean slate, you can wipe what it remembers from settings.
Only the accounts you connect, under the permissions you grant, and only the channels you invite it into. Remove a connection and the access goes with it.
Anything irreversible waits for a person: money moving, mail going out to customers, records being deleted. You set how far it may act on its own per task, and every action it takes is written to a log you can read.
That is the normal way to use it. Do the job in front of it once, correct the method it writes down, and approve the first real run. After that it is routine.
Add it to Slack or Teams, connect the first tool, and give it a job. Two minutes to the first one; the useful part starts the first time it finishes something for you.
Start free, keep every feature, and pay for the work it actually does.